Picture this: I’m hunched over my glowing office monitor, hours melting into revelations, caffeine-fueled and wide-eyed, diving into MIT’s “Mastering Negotiation and Influence” course. The maestro? Nice guy Mr. Jared Curhan: Gordon Kaufman Professor of Management, negotiation sage and a man who could probably talk & influence a shark into buying flippers..

In essence, his lessons didn’t just stock up my negotiation toolkit. They unearthed insights from my own medical psychology roots—bridging strategy, human interaction and a lifelong passion.

For me, it wasn’t just a course, it was more so an awakening: every negotiation is an intricate dance of influence, trust and persuasion, where subtlety meets power and intellect beautifully blends with intuition. The course reignited my obsession with psychology, fusing these two and others into a combustible cocktail of insight, a toast to brilliance at times.

Nowadays, I’m known for weaving negotiation with unexpected threads, from science to serendipity. Recently, I caught myself studying a waiter’s subtle sway before dinner, proof these lessons lurk everywhere. Curious? Let’s get into it and check if..

The “Zeigarnik Effect” can be -Your Secret Weapon in Negotiation?

Imagine the worst like walking away from a negotiation table with a deal half-done, key issues still dangling unresolved. Frustrating? Absolutely! But here’s the twist: What if I told you that this unfinished business is apsychological lever that could actually work in your favor? Here we enter the Zeigarnik Effect, a quirky psychological phenomenon that might just hold the key to elevating your negotiation game.

As someone with a passion for connecting diverse fields to the art of negotiation, you’re in for a treat as we explore how this concept can weave its magic into your strategies, so what Is the Zeigarnik Effect?

Let’s start with the basics. The “Zeigarnik Effect”, named after Soviet psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik, suggests that people remember uncompleted or interrupted tasks far better than those they’ve finished. Picture a waiter in a bustling restaurant: they recall every detail of unpaid orders with uncanny precision, yet once the bill is settled, those details vanish from their mind like smoke..

Why? Because our brains are wired to cling to “unfinished business”, creating a mental itch—a tension—that nags at us until the task is complete. The kick is: It’s “universal language”. It applies to all humans.

This phenomenon isn’t just a fun fact; at times it’s a powerful force. Think about cliffhangers in your favorite TV series—those unresolved plot twists that keep you hooked, obsessing over what’s next. That’s the Zeigarnik Effect at play, and let’s meet it with the intricate dance of negotiation, The Art of Unfinished Business so to say..

Negotiation is the art of navigating toward agreement, a delicate balance of strategy, compromise and human psychology. Whether you’re hashing out a contract, brokering a deal, or mediating a dispute, it’s rarely a straight path. Issues get resolved, stalled, or left hanging—and that’s where the Zeigarnik Effect sneaks in.

Consider a typical 2person multi-issue negotiation scenario: you’re discussing multiple points—price, terms, deadlines. Some get settled quickly, but others remain contentious and the session ends without full resolution. During the break, what do you find yourself mulling over?

Not the agreed-upon items, but the unresolved ones. They linger in your mind, demanding attention. The same happens to the other party. This mental stickiness is the Zeigarnik Effect in action, subtly shaping how you both approach the next round.

The Connection: How Unresolved Issues Drive Negotiation Dynamics

So, how does this psychological quirk connect to negotiation? At its core, the Zeigarnik Effect amplifies the salience of unfinished issues. When a negotiation pauses with key points still open, those points don’t just sit quietly—they dominate your thoughts. This can influence:

  • Memory and Focus: Unresolved issues stick out like sore thumbs, making them easier to recall and harder to ignore. Both sides might spend the interim pondering these sticking points, refining their arguments or rethinking their positions.
  • Motivation: That mental tension? It’s a motivator. The desire to scratch that itch—to resolve the unresolved—can push parties back to the table, eager to find closure.
  • Strategy: Here’s where it gets interesting. If you know unresolved issues loom large in the mind, you might strategically choose which issues to leave open, steering the negotiation’s psychological undercurrent in your favor.

A Strategic Edge: Wielding the Zeigarnik Effect

Imagine you’re negotiating a contract, and one clause—say, a payment term—is critical to you. You could push to resolve it early, but what if you let it hang unresolved at the session’s end? The Zeigarnik Effect suggests that clause will weigh heavily on the other party’s mind during the break. They might mull over your position, brainstorm solutions, or even soften their stance, all because the unresolved nature keeps it front and center.

Take a sales negotiation as another example. A savvy salesperson might present a proposal with a few details left vague—perhaps delivery timelines or bonus incentives—prompting the buyer to dwell on the offer. That lingering thought could tip the scales from “maybe” to “yes,” as the buyer’s mind wrestles with the unfinished puzzle.

But it’s a double-edged sword. The Zeigarnik Effect is psychological jiu-jitsu.The same effect applies to you. Leave your pain points unresolved and you risk getting armbarred by your own brain—obsessing over their demands, replaying their arguments and sliding into unplanned compromises. The trick? Be deliberate about what’s left hanging and when.

Real-World Examples?

Let’s ground this in reality and consider peace talks: think Camp David or Oslo. Take the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. Key disarmament clauses were intentionally left unresolved early on. During pauses, the IRA and British government fixated on those gaps, a tension that later fueled compromise. Historical negotiations, like those in protracted conflicts, often adjourn with core disputes unresolved. During the hiatus, leaders and mediators reflect deeply on those open wounds, sometimes paving the way for breakthroughs when talks resume. The mental pull of the unresolved is a quiet but potent force.

“Unfinished business, it turns out, can be a peacemaking tool; isn’t just noise – it’s fuel” ←- How nice have I said that? (;-))

The Pitfalls: When the Effect Backfires

Before you start leaving every negotiation half-finished, a word of caution. The Zeigarnik Effect isn’t a magic bullet. If overplayed, it risks:

  • Frustration: Constantly dangling issues might annoy the other party, eroding trust—crucial in long-term partnerships.
  • Fixation: You or your counterpart might obsess over minor unresolved points, losing sight of the bigger picture and skewing priorities.
  • Manipulation Perception: If they catch on to your strategy, it could sour the relationship.

Balance is key. Use the effect subtly—leave meaty, relevant issues open in good intent to keep minds engaged, but resolve enough to build momentum and goodwill.

Here’s how I think you can harness the Zeigarnik Effect in your next negotiation:

  1. Choose Wisely: Identify issues critical to your goals and consider leaving them unresolved at strategic moments, ensuring they dominate post-session thinking.
  2. Pace the Process: Resolve smaller items early to build trust, letting the Zeigarnik Effect amplify focus on bigger, unresolved stakes later.
  3. Mind Your Mind: Recognize when unresolved issues are tugging at your thoughts—step back to maintain perspective and avoid rash concessions.
  4. Test It Out: In your next negotiation, observe how leaving certain points open affects your counterpart’s behavior. Do they circle back to those issues more eagerly?

A Final Note: Thoughtful Application

While psychology and the Zeigarnik Effect offers a fascinating lens onto negotiation use cases, it’s not a one-size-fits-all tactic. Its impact can vary, some studies crossed my desk question its consistency, suggesting it depends on factors like task importance or personality. So, wield it thoughtfully, as one tool among many in your negotiation toolbelt.

By understanding how unresolved issues linger in the mind, you can sharpen your strategies, manage your biases, and maybe—just maybe—turn the art of the unfinished finally into your advantage.

So here’s the question: What unresolved issue have YOU been avoiding? Because right now, someone’s mental itch is festering over it. Will you let them control the scratch… or wield the Zeigarnik Effect to make them beg for closure?

Best till next time!

How Proactive Negotiation and Diplomacy Acts as Globalization’s Immune System, and Why We Need a Booster Shot now

The World Economic Forum’s 2024 Global Risks Report reads like a dystopian blockbuster: AI-driven disinformation hijacks democracies, climate chaos redraws borders and geoeconomic fractures threaten to shatter supply chains.

Anyhow, maybe beneath the doomscroll lies an underrated superpower: Negotiation. Not the stiff, boardroom kind, but a dynamic, adaptive craft that stitches alliances from nowadays chaos. Let’s think of it as Humanity’s Immune System:

Identifying threats, mobilizing defenses, well thought strategies and leaving antibodies of cooperation in its wake. Let’s explore how cutting-edge diplomacy and negotiation can turn the WEF’s top risks into a roadmap for –Resilience.

AI & Misinformation: Prebunking the “Infodemic”

WEF Risk (Short-Term #1, Long-Term #5): Lies now spread at algorithmic speed, eroding trust in everything from elections to climate science.

Negotiation Antidote: Cross-Sector Truth Compacts.

Imagine Meta, the EU and independent fact-checkers negotiating a pact where AI tools like an upcoming GPT-6 “prebunk” fake news by flooding social feeds with context before myths go viral. Chile’s 2023 deal with TikTok offers a blueprint: during wildfire season, the platform prioritized videos from scientists explaining fire dynamics –before conspiracy theories could ignite. Negotiation here isn’t about control, but collaborative coding: rewriting the rules of the attention economy so truth outruns fiction.

“Cuban Missile Crisis lasted 13 days. AI misinformation wars will rage for 13 milliseconds.”

Geoeconomic Fractures: From Zero-Sum to “Coopetition”

WEF Risk (Short-Term #9): Nations are locked in a 21st-century scramble for chips, minerals, and AI dominance.

Negotiation Antidote: Resource Mutualism

Why should the U.S. and China duel over rare-earth metals when they could co-own a Neutral Mineral Trust? Picture a BRICS-brokered vault—managed via blockchain—where critical resources are pooled and released only for green tech projects. This isn’t utopian; it’s pragmatic. During the 1970s oil crisis, rivals created the International Energy Agency to share reserves. Today’s proactive negotiators must weaponize interdependence: “You need my lithium? I need your semiconductors. Let’s swap. Not fight.”

Cyber Espionage: Hack-for-Hack Ceasefires

WEF Risk (Short-Term #5, Long-Term #9): Digital Cold Wars escalate as states weaponize code.

Negotiation Antidote: Digital Geneva Conventions

Inspired by Cold War arms treaties, imagine a pact where rivals like the U.S. and Russia agree to disclose cyber vulnerabilities simultaneously. Llike a digital handshake where each exposes one flaw in the other’s infrastructure, then both patch them. Blockchain could enforce transparency, with “Switzerland Servers” acting as neutral zones for breach disclosures. The goal?

Turn cyberwarfare into a game of mutual repair, not mutual destruction.

Climate Migration: Visas Against the Tide

WEF Risk (Short-Term #8): Rising seas could displace 1.2 billion by 2050, sparking border crises.

Negotiation Antidote: Climate Mobility Compacts

The EU and Pacific island nations are quietly drafting “Temp-to-Permit” visas. Pre-negotiated deals where climate refugees receive temporary residency, with fast-tracked citizenship for skills in high demand (nursing, engineering). This isn’t charity; it’s demographic arbitrage. Germany needs 1.5 million workers yearly by 2030 to sustain its economy. Fiji needs lifelines for drowning villages.

Proactive Negotiation bridges desperation with demand.

Human Rights: Shadow Diplomacy’s Quiet Power

WEF Risk (Short-Term #10): Autocracies weaponize tech to crush dissent.

Negotiation Antidote: Backchannel Bargains

When Norway recently upgraded Iran’s energy grid, the unspoken condition was unblocking Signal and Telegram for activists. No grand treaties—just a tech-for-rights trade. Similarly, Starlink terminals arrive in Myanmar disguised as “rural broadband kits,” with usage clauses preventing censorship. These deals aren’t naïve; they’re stealthy. Like mRNA vaccines, they deliver incremental change under the radar.

Resource Shortages: Tokenizing Survival

WEF Risk (Long-Term #4): Water wars loom as aquifers drain.

Negotiation Antidote: NFTs for the Commons

The Nile River dispute, where Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan feud over dams, could be solved by tokenizing water rights into Resource NFTs. A UN-managed platform would let nations bid annually for usage “shares,” with algorithms adjusting allocations based on drought forecasts. It’s the 21st-century version of 19th-century water pacts: programmable, transparent and cheat-proof.

The Negotiation Renaissance:

The WEF’s risks aren’t prophecies, for me, they’re invitations. Negotiation, reimagined, is how we RSVP. While AI can crunch data or simulate scenarios, it cannot replicate the irreplaceable human ingredients of diplomacy: trust, empathy, ethics, and the courage to reimagine the possible. Yes, machines might draft trade clauses or predict conflict hotspots, but they cannot stare a dictator in the eye and broker a backchannel deal to unblock Signal. They cannot design a “climate visa” system that balances a nation’s economic needs with a migrant’s dignity.

This is the negotiator’s renaissance. To those fearing obsolescence: your role isn’t disappearing! It’s evolving. The negotiators of tomorrow won’t just facilitate deals; they’ll engineer ecosystems.

Think less “mediator in a suit” and more “architect of societal antifragility.”

Use AI as a tool, not a rival. Let it model resource shortages or simulate disinformation cascades, while you focus on the messy, glorious work of aligning clashing values, culture, and at times survival instincts.

Partly gone are the days of seeking “win-win” as a default only. Today’s challenging polycrises demand negotiators who can pivot between “survive-thrive” frameworks, crafting coalitions to outmaneuver AI’s ethical black boxes, hacking bureaucratic inertia to fast-track climate visas, or poetically reframing resource scarcity as shared opportunity.

The future belongs to those who negotiate like they’re writing code: iterative, collaborative, and relentlessly beta-testing solutions. Proactivity is non-negotiable.

Just as I dissected the WEF’s risks to draft this blog post, tomorrow’s dealmakers must anticipate, simulate and preempt -building bridges before the river floods.

So, to the negotiators doubting their relevance: Your humanity is your edge. AI can’t replicate your intuition for the unspoken, your grit to push past “no,” or your vision to turn a dystopian risk into a blueprint for collective resilience. The machines are coming? Good. Let them handle the spreadsheets.

You’ve got a world to re-negotiate: “AI might write the rules – But only humans can rewrite the whole grand chessboard game.”